State of CA. Wrongful termination?

Would we greatfully examination my incident as well as establish either we feel there are enough drift for claiming prejudicial termination?

My former employer is formed in Texas as well as we worked for them as a sales deputy formed in California.  Shortly after being promoted to a brand brand brand brand new position of authority, a association deputy flew in to locale to examination my pursuit performance.  He was not gratified with what he saw as well as ripped me a brand brand brand brand new one.  Then he leaned upon his brand brand brand brand new subordinate (my boss) to put me upon a 30-day opening examination plan.

Five days later, my trainer flew in to locale as well as conducted a same opening examination as his (new) trainer did five days earlier.  Following a review, my trainer stated which I, as always, was doing a excellent job.  However, notwithstanding which certain feedback he had me pointer a request which put me upon 30-day notice to meet certain objectives which would represent improvement.  I reluctantly sealed a request as a claims were totally biased as well as many did not mount up to cold tough interpretation which we all had entrance to.

Nevertheless, as we indicated, we sealed a letter.  Then, we sent a minute to HR indicating out how a brand brand new opening reviews were terribly a single sided, yet we would gladly fool around round as well as alter my habits to enter into them with a brand brand brand brand new expectations of a company.

So, three weeks hurl by as well as while my trainer was upon eighth month for dual of them, we complied with all which was requested of me.  I was even out behaving ALL of my peers national to a point where we was creation them demeanour bad.  In fact, after my dismissal, we even perceived such feedback to endorse my fears.  However, notwithstanding my noticeable spurt in activity, we was still since a stop notice citing "lack of improvement".

Naturally, we objected to such a silly explain as well as my trainer (who executed a termination) reviewed a interpretation to endorse which my opening did indeed denote conspicuous improvement.  He even questioned a decision with HQ, yet they still wished to lift out a termination.  At this point, we refused to pointer a stop presentation request out of principle; for a information as well as claims therein were patently fake as well as a elementary examination of any current sales report would endorse as much.

Now, we utterly determine as well as assimilate which we am an "at-will" employee.  In fact, as upsetting as it would have been, we would have accepted my stop without a quarrel IF my employer had finished so in a really commencement when a brand brand brand brand new man was promoted as well as he came out to dump upon me.  Instead, we felt we was run by a mill, made to shoot for targets no a single else was compulsory to hit, as well as suffered unjustified agonise as a holidays were only around a dilemma as well as my pursuit was put upon a line.  But, similar to we said, we met a expectations as well as had no reason to believe it would all come to an end.

So, my subject is, deliberation a scenario we described, do we have drift to explain prejudicial termination?

Thank we in allege for your kind feedback.